Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The EEOC has proposed significant changes in the way EEO-1 forms are to be completed, including revisions to the scope of the race/ethnicity categories and in the definition of job categories. The proposed revisions were published on June 11, 2003 in Volume 68, No. 112, pages 34965-69 of the Federal Register. Comments on the proposed revisions will be accepted until August 11.
The EEOC proposal includes modifications of the race/ethnicity categories, most notably by eliminating Hispanic or Latino as a race category, and instead treating it as an ethnicity. Hispanic employees would not be included in race categories. Employees must be categorized under the following races: White; Black or African American; Asian; Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander; American Indian or Alaskan Native; or two or more races.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.