Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

New York Real Estate Law ReporterKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Hidden Defects in Title

By Bruce J. Bergman
September 01, 2003

Hidden defects in title are one of the nightmares of the title insurance industry – as well as one of the protections that make the purchase of title insurance the more alluring. Although only experience may supply the ultimate answer, there is a possibility that the new “predatory lending law” in New York will generate lurking infirmities in titles devolving through mortgage foreclosure actions that may render tenuous the issuance of insurance on such properties. (L.2002, ch.626, amending the banking law, the general business law and the real property actions and proceedings law.) The immediate heart of the issue relates to the new RPAPL 1302, entitled “Foreclosure of High-cost Home Loans.” Subsection (1) now requires that any complaint served for foreclosure of a high-cost home loan must affirmatively allege that the plaintiff has complied with all the provisions of banking law section 595-a and 6-1. In addition, that allegation must be proven to the satisfaction of the court before judgment (by default or otherwise) can be entered. Subsection (2) specifically denominates as a defense to foreclosure that the home loan violates any provision of section 6-1 of the banking law.

Although there is much more about the new statute yet to analyze, here are some scenarios, and the questions they raise, which might give pause to underwriting counsel:

  • First scenario. A property is struck down in foreclosure to the highest bidder. That bidder solicits a title search and title insurance. The complaint did not allege, not did mortgagee prove, compliance with all the provision of banking law sections 595-a and 6-1. If the mortgage was not a high-cost home loan (an analysis the title company must undertake), there is presumably no issue because the affirmative allegation could not have been required.
  • Second scenario. If the title company confirms that the mortgage was in the high-cost category, but the foreclosing mortgage holder neither asserted nor proved compliance with the statute, the possibility of serious danger prowls so presumably an insurer would be reluctant to insure the title.
  • Third scenario. Change the facts to a case where the mortgage is concededly a high-cost home loan but the allegation is both pleaded and proven, a predicate for judgment of foreclosure and sale. Can the title company evaluate whether compliance with statutory dictates really exists – just in case a defaulting borrower (or some other party) surfaces after the sale to challenge the action? Mindful that the new statute imposes a plethora of mandates and prohibitions, as well as harsh and extensive enforcement mechanisms, there may be room for doubt in resolving scenario number three.

Dangers in Enforcement

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.