Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A Word to the Wise
A party moves to compel arbitration. The court grants the motion. Should the court dismiss the action or stay the proceeding? If the court dismisses the action, should the dismissal be with or without prejudice? I was always under the impression that it did not much matter, as a party seeking to affirm or challenge the subsequent arbitration award could always re-file the action after the arbitration. Whether this judge or another heard the subsequent proceeding seemed of little consequence. It turns out that whether a court dismisses the action or merely stays the court proceeding after compelling arbitration does in fact matter, but for quite different reasons, as highlighted by the Second Circuit's recent decision in Cap Gemini v. Nackel, 346 F.3d 360 (2d Cir. 10/14/03) (Meskill, Miner, and Straub, Cir. Judges)
In Cap Gemini, the employer moved in the Southern District to compel arbitration and to stay a California court action brought by a former employee, Nackel. The district court granted the employer's motion to compel, and stayed the California court action. The district court also stayed the action pending before it, placing it on the court's suspense calendar. The district court explained in a later order that it chose to stay rather than dismiss the case “to allow the parties the opportunity to seek confirmation of any arbitral award without filing a second action in federal court.” The district court further explained that it was the court's intent that its order be final and dispositive of the entire case.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
Bit Parts
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.