Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A party moves to compel arbitration. The court grants the motion. Should the court dismiss the action or stay the proceeding? If the court dismisses the action, should the dismissal be with or without prejudice? I was always under the impression that it did not much matter, as a party seeking to affirm or challenge the subsequent arbitration award could always re-file the action after the arbitration. Whether this judge or another heard the subsequent proceeding seemed of little consequence. It turns out that whether a court dismisses the action or merely stays the court proceeding after compelling arbitration does in fact matter, but for quite different reasons, as highlighted by the Second Circuit's recent decision in Cap Gemini v. Nackel, 346 F.3d 360 (2d Cir. 10/14/03) (Meskill, Miner, and Straub, Cir. Judges)
In Cap Gemini, the employer moved in the Southern District to compel arbitration and to stay a California court action brought by a former employee, Nackel. The district court granted the employer's motion to compel, and stayed the California court action. The district court also stayed the action pending before it, placing it on the court's suspense calendar. The district court explained in a later order that it chose to stay rather than dismiss the case “to allow the parties the opportunity to seek confirmation of any arbitral award without filing a second action in federal court.” The district court further explained that it was the court's intent that its order be final and dispositive of the entire case.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.