Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The widespread use of arbitration in insurance and reinsurance disputes was intended to allow parties to resolve complex disputes quickly and efficiently by having persons with knowledge of the specialized terminology, standards, and practices of the insurance industry act as decision makers. This aspiration has been superseded by protracted and voluminous discovery, continual delays and postponements, extensive briefing, and lengthy hearings. In essence, all of the foibles of litigation have crept into the world of arbitration, leaving the insurance industry once again in search of an efficient method to resolve disputes.
Last year, the International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution ('CPR'), in consultation with leading insurers and law firms in the London and American insurance markets, advanced a new International Reinsurance Industry Dispute Resolution Protocol (the 'Protocol') to provide the insurance industry with an alternative to litigation or lengthy arbitration. CPR has been involved in the property-casualty insurance community for more than 20 years and maintains an active Insurance Committee composed of representatives of insurance companies that meet at least twice a year to consider new tools to advocate and support alternative dispute resolution within the insurance industry. CPR also has a Corporate Insurance Coverage Committee consisting of representatives of corporate policyholders, commercial insurers, and coverage and defense counsel. This committee creates and promulgates methods for managing policyholder coverage disputes without litigation.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.