Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Ephedra Bankruptcy Cases and the Twinlab Global Settlement Model

By David J. Molton and Steven B. Smith
December 21, 2007

It began a little over four years ago, in late September 2003, with a simple but urgent telephone call from pioneering ephedra plaintiffs' attorney Anne Andrews (of Orange County, CA-based Andrews & Thornton) to one of the authors. The caller asked about the impact of the then-recently filed bankruptcy of TwinLab, an ephedra weight-loss product manufacturer and a significant player in the food and vitamin supplement industry, on that company's products liability insurance policies. Four major ephedra manufacturer bankruptcies later, the situation ended on Sept. 25, 2007, when the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California entered an order in the ephedra-related Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Metabolife International confirming Metabolife's plan of liquidation, which allowed for the settlement of over 150 fully insured and approximately 259 under-insured personal injury tort and wrongful death ('PITWD') claims against Metabolife and non-debtor third parties for an aggregate sum of approximately $90 million.

The Metabolife case was the last and largest in a series of ephedra-related bankruptcy cases/insolvency proceedings that commenced in 2003, just before the Food and Drug Administration's April 2004 ban of ephedra dietary products. These included such companies as TwinLab, Muscletech (a cross-border proceeding), NVE, Inc. and Nutraquest. The ephedra cases presented myriad unique and challenging issues, including the propriety of non-debtor third party releases and injunctions in aid thereof in cases dealing with mass torts other than asbestos; the disposition of purported class claims in bankruptcies; and the interplay of bankruptcy cases and federal multidistrict litigation proceedings. Despite the numerous challenges that plagued each ephedra case, Brown Rudnick, as counsel to official committees in all but one of the bankruptcy cases (Nutraquest), together with other bankruptcy parties and the constituent creditors that Brown Rudnick represented in each of the ephedra cases ' many of whose representatives (such as Ms. Andrews and other recognized plaintiffs' attorneys such as Steven Skikos of California's Lopez, Hodes, Restaino, Milman & Skikos; Ed Blizzard of Texas' Blizzard, McCarthy & Nabers LLP; Russell Briggs of Texas'
Fibich Hampton & Leebron LLP; Robert Rikard of South Carolina's Whetstone, Myers, Perkins & Young; and Robert Roden of Alabama's Shelby-Roden LLC) were instrumental participants ' formulated and successfully implemented global settlement architecture, which has become known as the TwinLab model. This architecture has now resulted in over $150 million in settlement proceeds for the benefit of hundreds of injured PITWD claimants across the country and made available meaningful and fair recoveries for other non-tort creditor constituencies.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment Image

On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.