Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The 21st-Century workplace is not your parents' workplace. Fewer women are choosing, or are economically permitted, to stay home after they have children and, as a result, there are significantly more women working, full-time or part-time. At the same time, studies indicate that the amount of time men spend on childcare has tripled since 1965. A natural consequence of the spike in the number of two-income families in the last 30 years is that men are now shouldering more child-rearing obligations. In addition, many employees are assuming caregiver responsibilities for their elderly parents or disabled family members. Consequently, the pool of employees who bear some caregiver responsibilities and thus are potentially entitled to family responsibilities discrimination ('FRD') protection is enormous and crosses gender, racial, economic and generational lines.
It is, therefore, not surprising that FRD has become one of the most important and difficult issues facing employers. How do employers retain valuable employees, who have significant family responsibilities? Equally perplexing, how do employers fairly and effectively manage non-performers who also happen to act as primary caregivers? These complicated dilemmas can easily turn into legal exposure when employers make stereotypical assumptions about which gender is best suited for caregiving, the commitment level employees should have before and after they have children or the accommodations or restrictions necessary when an employee assumes responsibilities at home. Employers need an attack plan and must begin to think creatively to address every situation that arises in the workplace to protect themselves from increasingly popular FRD claims.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.