Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Cooperatives & Condominiums
Condominium's Failure to File Notice of Lien
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Levin
Leasing Restrictions Exceed Association's Authority
Strathmore Ridge Homeowners Association v. Mendicino
* * *
Development
Access Road Not a Permitted Use
Matter of BBJ Associates, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Unexcavated Quarry
Buffalo Crushed Stone, Inc. v. Town of Cheektowaga
Helicopter Landing Area
Town of Riverhead v. Gezari
Prior Variance Denial
Matter of Waidler v. Young
Failure to Comply with Standard Justifies Special Exception Denial
Matter of Franklin Square Donut System LLC v. Wright
Municipal Misconduct; Application of Superseded Ordinance
Matter of Golden Horizon Terryville Corp. v. Prusinowski
* * *
Landlord & Tenant
Rescission for Mutual Mistake About Zoning
S. C. Dandey Realty Corp. v. Nick's Hideaway, Inc.
Tenant's Insurer Must Defend and Indemnify Landlord
Kassis v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.
* * *
Real Property Law
Purchase Waived Title Objections
Beagle Developers LLC v. Long Island Beagle Club #11
Seller Not Required to Remove Wastes
Waldman v LDK Realty, Inc.
Cooperatives & Condominiums
Condominium's Failure to File Notice of Lien
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Levin
Leasing Restrictions Exceed Association's Authority
Strathmore Ridge Homeowners Association v. Mendicino
* * *
Development
Access Road Not a Permitted Use
Matter of BBJ Associates, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Unexcavated Quarry
Buffalo Crushed Stone, Inc. v. Town of Cheektowaga
Helicopter Landing Area
Town of Riverhead v. Gezari
Prior Variance Denial
Matter of Waidler v. Young
Failure to Comply with Standard Justifies Special Exception Denial
Matter of Franklin Square Donut System LLC v. Wright
Municipal Misconduct; Application of Superseded Ordinance
Matter of Golden Horizon Terryville Corp. v. Prusinowski
* * *
Landlord & Tenant
Rescission for Mutual Mistake About Zoning
S. C. Dandey Realty Corp. v. Nick's Hideaway, Inc.
Tenant's Insurer Must Defend and Indemnify Landlord
Kassis v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.
* * *
Real Property Law
Purchase Waived Title Objections
Beagle Developers LLC v. Long Island Beagle Club #11
Seller Not Required to Remove Wastes
Waldman v LDK Realty, Inc.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.