Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When an IRS Code ' 1031 “qualified intermediary” files for bankruptcy, this triggers unique challenges to the constitutionality of the bankruptcy process, as well as to the boundaries of a bankruptcy court's equitable powers under Bankruptcy Code ' 105 and interpretations of state property law. Section 1031 of the U.S Tax Code allows taxpayers to avoid paying taxes on capital gains resulting from sales of real property through a type of “like-kind exchange.” To accomplish the exchange, the taxpayer must give a “qualified intermediary” (QI) constructive possession of the proceeds from the sale of real property, and direct the QI to apply those proceeds the purchase of a “replacement” within 180 days. Once the exchange is completed, the taxpayer is no longer required to pay any capital gain taxes on the proceeds. Often, the QI is given full legal dominion over the proceeds under an exchange agreement for period from the original sale until closing on the replacement property.
Ideally, 1031 exchanges provide a significant tax benefit while allowing the QI to make a profit on the 180-day private investment. However, when the investment does not yield a profit and obligations exceed the amount of incoming funds, the model crumbles. Bankruptcy may then result, and the ensuing case can be emotionally charged and present significant administrative and legal challenges for creditors and debtors. A recent example of such a case is the Land America bankruptcy, in which approximately 450 individual exchangers suddenly lost legal possession of their exchange proceeds when Land America filed for bankruptcy.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.