Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Claims Risks

By Susan F. Friedman
March 29, 2011

Over the past 12 months, in-house counsel have likely read about their contemporaries:

  • Charged with obstructing justice by misleading government investigators in their probes of off-label uses for pharmaceuticals;
  • Sentenced to federal prison for defrauding the Internal Revenue Service;
  • Found liable for damages for the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information;
  • Terminated from employment for the unauthorized practice of law;
  • Attempting appeals for convictions involving conspiracy, fraud, and making false statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC);
  • Accused of negligently supervising brokers who attempted stock market manipulation;
  • Disciplined or sanctioned for spoliation of electronic evidence; and
  • Found in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) by engaging in bribery.

There were other in-house counsel indicted on weapons charges, conspiracy and obstruction of justice; sentenced to prison for obstructing proceedings before the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC); used as scapegoats by senior executives; suspended from employment due to ethical violations; and disbarred and imprisoned for conspiracy and money laundering. Many in-house attorneys continued to endure the fallout from the financial crisis and stock option backdating cases.

As in-house counsel continue to juggle their roles between corporate gatekeepers and confidants, they face a host of emerging risks. The passage of new statutes, creation and rejuvenation of regulatory bodies, and the revitalization of existing laws all pose new potential liabilities around compliance and due diligence. Examples include:

  • The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and its '922 whistleblower bounty provision or '1502 requiring disclosure of the source of conflict minerals, the use of which companies are being asked to track. Examples of such minerals are tin, tantalum, gold and tungsten;
  • The FTC's privacy protection framework and its Red Flags Rule;
  • Mandates from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act;
  • Amendments to the False Claims Act;
  • Modifications to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines clarifying standards for determining effective compliance programs;
  • The multi-agency initiative to increase criminal prosecutions of individuals for violations of the food and drug laws;
  • The FDIC's current agenda as to failed banks;
  • The Environmental Protection Agency's crackdown on everything from greenhouse gas emissions to oil spills;
  • The IRS' launch of 6,000 compensation probes;
  • The application of Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as it relates to cloud computing and electronically stored information; and
  • The application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act's '1519 prohibiting the destruction or concealment of documents to influence a department or agency of the U.S.

The Old Story Revisited

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.