Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b><i>BREAKING NEWS:</i></b> King & Spalding Drops Marriage Case; Former Solicitor General Quits Firm

By David Ingram
April 25, 2011

After a week of criticism from gay-rights groups, King & Spalding reversed itself on April 25 and asked to withdraw as counsel in charge of defending the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

In a statement, firm chairman Robert Hays Jr. said the process for vetting its involvement in the litigation was 'inadequate.' Hays took responsibility for 'any mistakes' and apologized.

Former U.S. solicitor general Paul Clement, who has been leading the litigation, is resigning in protest. See below for more.

Organizations that advocate for gays and lesbians, most prominently the Human Rights Campaign based in Washington, have harshly criticized the firm's involvement with the litigation and promised to target the firm's clients and recruits. A news conference had been scheduled for April 26 in Atlanta, where the law firm is based.

King & Spalding's involvement in the litigation became public on April 18, and Hays' statement says the firm's attempt to withdraw began soon after. 'Last week we worked diligently through the process required for withdrawal,' the statement says.

'In reviewing this assignment further, I determined that the process used for vetting this engagement was inadequate,' the statement continues. 'Ultimately I am responsible for any mistakes that occurred and apologize for the challenges this may have created.'

The request for withdrawal leaves Republicans in the U.S. House without outside counsel to defend the 1996 law, but in filings in federal court in Manhattan, King & Spalding asks the court to give the House additional time to find new counsel. Withdrawal requires the approval of the court, according to the filings.

The court filings are signed by Richard Cirillo, a partner in King & Spalding's New York office and, according to his firm profile, the chairman of the firm's ethics committee. Former U.S. solicitor general Paul Clement, the chairman of King & Spalding's appellate practice, has been the firm's lead attorney on the same-sex marriage litigation.

A hearing is scheduled for May 25 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, according to the filings.

Hays did not elaborate on any vetting mistakes. A spokesman said the firm would have no comment beyond Hays' statement. A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), who hired King & Spalding, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.



Clement Leaves King & Spalding to Continue Same-Sex Marriage Litigation

Former U.S. solicitor general Paul Clement is resigning from King & Spalding in protest after the law firm's request on April 25 to withdraw from lawsuits about the Defense of Marriage Act.

Clement says he'll continue working on the same-sex marriage litigation on behalf of U.S. House Republicans from Bancroft, a small Washington litigation firm. And in a two-page letter to King & Spalding's chairman, Robert Hays Jr., Clement pointedly disagreed with King & Spalding's handling of the matter.

The letter says a law firm should not abandon a representation 'because the client's legal position is extremely unpopular in certain quarters.'

'Defending unpopular positions is what lawyers do,' Clement writes. 'The adversary system of justice depends on it, especially in cases where the passions run high. Efforts to delegitimize any representation for one side of a legal controversy are a profound threat to the rule of law.'

The letter also takes issue with the idea that King & Spalding did not thoroughly vet the contract that Clement signed with the House General Counsel's Office this month, an idea that Hays mentioned in a statement today. 'I would have never undertaken this matter unless I believed I had the full backing of the firm,' Clement writes, adding that, 'If there were problems with the firm's vetting process, we should fix the vetting process, not drop the representation.'

Clement rejoined King & Spalding in 2008 in a much-watched move reportedly worth $5 million a year. He had been head of the firm's appellate practice until he became deputy solicitor general in 2001. He became solicitor general in 2005.

In his resignation letter, Clement writes that he has 'immense fondness' for his colleagues and for King & Spalding, but that 'my loyalty to the client and respect for the profession must come first.' He ends with a quote from former U.S. attorney general Griffin Bell, a longtime King & Spalding partner, warning that lawyers have a duty to finish a representation after it begins.

Brendan Buck, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), said in an e-mailed statement that Clement 'has demonstrated legal integrity.'

At Bancroft, Clement will be a partner and he'll link up with another veteran of the Justice Department from George W. Bush's presidency: Viet Dinh, a former assistant attorney general. H. Christopher Bartolomucci, an associate White House counsel under Bush, is also a partner.

In a news release from Bancroft, Clement said his new firm 'offers its clients premier talent, without all the baggage of a mega firm. We are shaking up the D.C. legal establishment.'

Dinh, in the same news release, said Clement 'is a perfect fit with Bancroft, where we are building the next great law firm.'

Click here for a copy of Clement's letter.


David Ingram writes for The BLT: The Blog of LegalTimes (http://legaltimes.typepad.com/).

 

After a week of criticism from gay-rights groups, King & Spalding reversed itself on April 25 and asked to withdraw as counsel in charge of defending the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

In a statement, firm chairman Robert Hays Jr. said the process for vetting its involvement in the litigation was 'inadequate.' Hays took responsibility for 'any mistakes' and apologized.

Former U.S. solicitor general Paul Clement, who has been leading the litigation, is resigning in protest. See below for more.

Organizations that advocate for gays and lesbians, most prominently the Human Rights Campaign based in Washington, have harshly criticized the firm's involvement with the litigation and promised to target the firm's clients and recruits. A news conference had been scheduled for April 26 in Atlanta, where the law firm is based.

King & Spalding's involvement in the litigation became public on April 18, and Hays' statement says the firm's attempt to withdraw began soon after. 'Last week we worked diligently through the process required for withdrawal,' the statement says.

'In reviewing this assignment further, I determined that the process used for vetting this engagement was inadequate,' the statement continues. 'Ultimately I am responsible for any mistakes that occurred and apologize for the challenges this may have created.'

The request for withdrawal leaves Republicans in the U.S. House without outside counsel to defend the 1996 law, but in filings in federal court in Manhattan, King & Spalding asks the court to give the House additional time to find new counsel. Withdrawal requires the approval of the court, according to the filings.

The court filings are signed by Richard Cirillo, a partner in King & Spalding's New York office and, according to his firm profile, the chairman of the firm's ethics committee. Former U.S. solicitor general Paul Clement, the chairman of King & Spalding's appellate practice, has been the firm's lead attorney on the same-sex marriage litigation.

A hearing is scheduled for May 25 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, according to the filings.

Hays did not elaborate on any vetting mistakes. A spokesman said the firm would have no comment beyond Hays' statement. A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), who hired King & Spalding, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.



Clement Leaves King & Spalding to Continue Same-Sex Marriage Litigation

Former U.S. solicitor general Paul Clement is resigning from King & Spalding in protest after the law firm's request on April 25 to withdraw from lawsuits about the Defense of Marriage Act.

Clement says he'll continue working on the same-sex marriage litigation on behalf of U.S. House Republicans from Bancroft, a small Washington litigation firm. And in a two-page letter to King & Spalding's chairman, Robert Hays Jr., Clement pointedly disagreed with King & Spalding's handling of the matter.

The letter says a law firm should not abandon a representation 'because the client's legal position is extremely unpopular in certain quarters.'

'Defending unpopular positions is what lawyers do,' Clement writes. 'The adversary system of justice depends on it, especially in cases where the passions run high. Efforts to delegitimize any representation for one side of a legal controversy are a profound threat to the rule of law.'

The letter also takes issue with the idea that King & Spalding did not thoroughly vet the contract that Clement signed with the House General Counsel's Office this month, an idea that Hays mentioned in a statement today. 'I would have never undertaken this matter unless I believed I had the full backing of the firm,' Clement writes, adding that, 'If there were problems with the firm's vetting process, we should fix the vetting process, not drop the representation.'

Clement rejoined King & Spalding in 2008 in a much-watched move reportedly worth $5 million a year. He had been head of the firm's appellate practice until he became deputy solicitor general in 2001. He became solicitor general in 2005.

In his resignation letter, Clement writes that he has 'immense fondness' for his colleagues and for King & Spalding, but that 'my loyalty to the client and respect for the profession must come first.' He ends with a quote from former U.S. attorney general Griffin Bell, a longtime King & Spalding partner, warning that lawyers have a duty to finish a representation after it begins.

Brendan Buck, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), said in an e-mailed statement that Clement 'has demonstrated legal integrity.'

At Bancroft, Clement will be a partner and he'll link up with another veteran of the Justice Department from George W. Bush's presidency: Viet Dinh, a former assistant attorney general. H. Christopher Bartolomucci, an associate White House counsel under Bush, is also a partner.

In a news release from Bancroft, Clement said his new firm 'offers its clients premier talent, without all the baggage of a mega firm. We are shaking up the D.C. legal establishment.'

Dinh, in the same news release, said Clement 'is a perfect fit with Bancroft, where we are building the next great law firm.'

Click here for a copy of Clement's letter.


David Ingram writes for The BLT: The Blog of LegalTimes (http://legaltimes.typepad.com/).

 

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.