Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is axiomatic that the purpose of filing a notice of pendency (the “N/P”) under C.P.L.R. ' 6501 in an action seeking to affect an interest in real property is to render unnecessary the joining as defendants those whose interests are later obtained from a defendant named in the N/P and those whose interests are recorded subsequent to the filing of the N/P. The latter serves “to prevent the acquisition of an interest in the [realty which is the] subject matter of the suit '” e.g., Nomura Home Equity Loan Inc. v. Vacchio, 21 Misc. 3d 333, 336, 334 (Sup., Nass. Co. 2008). The N/P protects a pre-existing interest, but does not give to the filer an interest in the realty. Filing a N/P is not a substitute for recording. A number of reported decisions thus have highlighted the proposition that unless the filer already has a superior interest in the subject real estate, the filed N/P provides no protection to the filer against any other claimant to the land who records a document conveying an interest in the real property to that purchaser (such as a deed or a contract to purchase the subject realty). This is so even if the recordation of the instrument conveying an interest in the realty occurs subsequent to the filing of the N/P, so long as the conveyee took the instrument for value and without notice of the filer's claim.
Cases in Point
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.