Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Although its effective date was postponed, new Family Division Rule 1.25-A (Rule) will bring significant changes to the practice of family law in New Hampshire. The Rule requires parties to produce financial information shortly after the commencement of a family court proceeding, without waiting for discovery requests to be propounded.
The Rule was adopted as part of an ongoing effort to increase efficiency in the process of domestic relations cases. Compliance with this Rule should assist parties and counsel in avoiding many costly and time-consuming discovery disputes. By codifying the expectations of which types of information must be produced, the Rule creates a uniform approach to financial discovery. This Rule provides for the exchange of basic discovery early on in the case, which starts the parties off on a positive note because they are exchanging and sharing information rather than litigating contested issues. In domestic relations cases, the parties do not always have equal access to information about financial matters. Requiring mandatory disclosure may assist in leveling the playing field, allowing both parties access to information, which in turn should enable them to prepare for settlement discussions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?