Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Everyone knows that divorce is a difficult process for the spouses involved and for their children, but you may not have thought of how it affects the family pet. Or maybe you have a beloved pet at home yourself and have wondered about this issue. The sad truth is that pets are often overlooked when it comes to divorce, and their status in the law is uncertain.
In a majority of jurisdictions nationwide, pets are put on par with a piece of furniture. Most courts that have published opinions on this issue have found that companion animals are personal property and therefore should be awarded to one party as part of equitable distribution. This approach may take into account some factors, such as who purchased the pet, in whose name the pet is registered or who pays the majority of the pet's expenses. It does not, however, take into consideration a multitude of other important factors, such as who cares for the pet on a daily basis, who brushes the pet, who feeds the pet, who cleans up after the pet, who takes the pet to the vet, who plays with the pet and who has the more appropriate home for the pet subsequent to the divorce.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?