Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Last month, we identified for our readers the basic concept of what designates an attorney's “office,” in a world of working at home; telecommuting; “virtual” law practices; “limited service” and “satellite” law offices; and offsite client meetings (at your local Starbucks or other neutral turf). See Sheldon I. Banoff, “When Should Attorneys Be in the Office? Part One,” LFPBR, Vol. 17, No. 7 (Sept. 2011), page 1. We identified the potential ramifications of having or not having an office on topics such as state licensure, the unauthorized practice of law, multi-state tax reporting and potential tax liabilities, and the potential violation of rules of professional conduct if one's letterhead, business cards or websites mislead the public as to the existence of an attorney's “office” where no office is deemed to exist.
This month, we focus on how long, when and why a lawyer should be “in the office.” Our analysis is not based on human resource or time management expertise (as your author has neither), but rather on, among other things, observations and anecdotes from our 37 years' experience as an attorney working in a medium and large law firm.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.