Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<B><I>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> <b>Facebook Settles with FTC over Privacy Violations</b>

 

Facebook has settled Federal Trade Commission charges that it deceived its users and failed to keep their information private, agreeing on Nov. 29 to establish a comprehensive privacy program that includes independent audits for the next 20 years.

The FTC alleged that Facebook violated the FTC Act, which bars unfair and deceptive conduct, by falsely promising consumers that their information would be kept private. “On numerous occasions, Facebook violated its privacy commitments to hundreds of millions of users,” said FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz in a conference call with reporters.

For example, the FTC alleged that Facebook changed its Web site in December 2009 so that previously private information, such as friend lists, were made public without warning users in advance or seeking their approval. Facebook also failed to reveal that third-party apps could access nearly all of users' personal data. Facebook also promised users that it would not share their personal information with advertisers, but did so nonetheless. The company also claimed that when users deactivated or deleted their accounts, their photos and videos would be inaccessible. But Facebook allowed access to the content, even after users had quit.

The settlement bars Facebook from making any further deceptive privacy claims, requires that the company get consumers' approval before it changes the way it shares their data, and requires that it obtain periodic assessments of its privacy practices by independent, third-party auditors for the next 20 years.

There are no monetary penalties ' the FTC does not have authority under the FTC Act to fine companies for violations. But if Facebook doesn't honor the deal, the company is on the hook for $16,000 per violation per day.

The consent decree also includes no admission of wrongdoing, although FTC founder Mark Zuckerberg in his blog acknowledged that “we've made a bunch of mistakes. In particular, I think that a small number of high profile mistakes, like Beacon four years ago and poor execution as we transitioned our privacy model two years ago, have often overshadowed much of the good work we've done.”

He continued, “Even before the agreement announced by the FTC today, Facebook had already proactively addressed many of the concerns the FTC raised.”

Zuckerberg announced the creation of two new corporate offices, naming Erin Egan, who was previously co-chairwoman of the global privacy and data security practice of Covington & Burling, as chief privacy officer for policy. Michael Richter will become chief privacy officer for products. He's currently Facebook's chief privacy counsel on the legal team.

In the FTC case, Facebook was represented by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partners S. Ashlie Beringer and M. Sean Royall and general counsel Theodore Ullyot.


Jenna Greene writes for The National Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy. She can be contacted at [email protected].

 

Facebook has settled Federal Trade Commission charges that it deceived its users and failed to keep their information private, agreeing on Nov. 29 to establish a comprehensive privacy program that includes independent audits for the next 20 years.

The FTC alleged that Facebook violated the FTC Act, which bars unfair and deceptive conduct, by falsely promising consumers that their information would be kept private. “On numerous occasions, Facebook violated its privacy commitments to hundreds of millions of users,” said FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz in a conference call with reporters.

For example, the FTC alleged that Facebook changed its Web site in December 2009 so that previously private information, such as friend lists, were made public without warning users in advance or seeking their approval. Facebook also failed to reveal that third-party apps could access nearly all of users' personal data. Facebook also promised users that it would not share their personal information with advertisers, but did so nonetheless. The company also claimed that when users deactivated or deleted their accounts, their photos and videos would be inaccessible. But Facebook allowed access to the content, even after users had quit.

The settlement bars Facebook from making any further deceptive privacy claims, requires that the company get consumers' approval before it changes the way it shares their data, and requires that it obtain periodic assessments of its privacy practices by independent, third-party auditors for the next 20 years.

There are no monetary penalties ' the FTC does not have authority under the FTC Act to fine companies for violations. But if Facebook doesn't honor the deal, the company is on the hook for $16,000 per violation per day.

The consent decree also includes no admission of wrongdoing, although FTC founder Mark Zuckerberg in his blog acknowledged that “we've made a bunch of mistakes. In particular, I think that a small number of high profile mistakes, like Beacon four years ago and poor execution as we transitioned our privacy model two years ago, have often overshadowed much of the good work we've done.”

He continued, “Even before the agreement announced by the FTC today, Facebook had already proactively addressed many of the concerns the FTC raised.”

Zuckerberg announced the creation of two new corporate offices, naming Erin Egan, who was previously co-chairwoman of the global privacy and data security practice of Covington & Burling, as chief privacy officer for policy. Michael Richter will become chief privacy officer for products. He's currently Facebook's chief privacy counsel on the legal team.

In the FTC case, Facebook was represented by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partners S. Ashlie Beringer and M. Sean Royall and general counsel Theodore Ullyot.


Jenna Greene writes for The National Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy. She can be contacted at [email protected].

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination Suits Image

In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.