Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<B><I>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> <b>Facebook Settles with FTC over Privacy Violations</b>

By Jenna Greene
November 30, 2011

 

Facebook has settled Federal Trade Commission charges that it deceived its users and failed to keep their information private, agreeing on Nov. 29 to establish a comprehensive privacy program that includes independent audits for the next 20 years.

The FTC alleged that Facebook violated the FTC Act, which bars unfair and deceptive conduct, by falsely promising consumers that their information would be kept private. “On numerous occasions, Facebook violated its privacy commitments to hundreds of millions of users,” said FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz in a conference call with reporters.

For example, the FTC alleged that Facebook changed its Web site in December 2009 so that previously private information, such as friend lists, were made public without warning users in advance or seeking their approval. Facebook also failed to reveal that third-party apps could access nearly all of users' personal data. Facebook also promised users that it would not share their personal information with advertisers, but did so nonetheless. The company also claimed that when users deactivated or deleted their accounts, their photos and videos would be inaccessible. But Facebook allowed access to the content, even after users had quit.

The settlement bars Facebook from making any further deceptive privacy claims, requires that the company get consumers' approval before it changes the way it shares their data, and requires that it obtain periodic assessments of its privacy practices by independent, third-party auditors for the next 20 years.

There are no monetary penalties ' the FTC does not have authority under the FTC Act to fine companies for violations. But if Facebook doesn't honor the deal, the company is on the hook for $16,000 per violation per day.

The consent decree also includes no admission of wrongdoing, although FTC founder Mark Zuckerberg in his blog acknowledged that “we've made a bunch of mistakes. In particular, I think that a small number of high profile mistakes, like Beacon four years ago and poor execution as we transitioned our privacy model two years ago, have often overshadowed much of the good work we've done.”

He continued, “Even before the agreement announced by the FTC today, Facebook had already proactively addressed many of the concerns the FTC raised.”

Zuckerberg announced the creation of two new corporate offices, naming Erin Egan, who was previously co-chairwoman of the global privacy and data security practice of Covington & Burling, as chief privacy officer for policy. Michael Richter will become chief privacy officer for products. He's currently Facebook's chief privacy counsel on the legal team.

In the FTC case, Facebook was represented by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partners S. Ashlie Beringer and M. Sean Royall and general counsel Theodore Ullyot.


Jenna Greene writes for The National Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy. She can be contacted at [email protected].

 

Facebook has settled Federal Trade Commission charges that it deceived its users and failed to keep their information private, agreeing on Nov. 29 to establish a comprehensive privacy program that includes independent audits for the next 20 years.

The FTC alleged that Facebook violated the FTC Act, which bars unfair and deceptive conduct, by falsely promising consumers that their information would be kept private. “On numerous occasions, Facebook violated its privacy commitments to hundreds of millions of users,” said FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz in a conference call with reporters.

For example, the FTC alleged that Facebook changed its Web site in December 2009 so that previously private information, such as friend lists, were made public without warning users in advance or seeking their approval. Facebook also failed to reveal that third-party apps could access nearly all of users' personal data. Facebook also promised users that it would not share their personal information with advertisers, but did so nonetheless. The company also claimed that when users deactivated or deleted their accounts, their photos and videos would be inaccessible. But Facebook allowed access to the content, even after users had quit.

The settlement bars Facebook from making any further deceptive privacy claims, requires that the company get consumers' approval before it changes the way it shares their data, and requires that it obtain periodic assessments of its privacy practices by independent, third-party auditors for the next 20 years.

There are no monetary penalties ' the FTC does not have authority under the FTC Act to fine companies for violations. But if Facebook doesn't honor the deal, the company is on the hook for $16,000 per violation per day.

The consent decree also includes no admission of wrongdoing, although FTC founder Mark Zuckerberg in his blog acknowledged that “we've made a bunch of mistakes. In particular, I think that a small number of high profile mistakes, like Beacon four years ago and poor execution as we transitioned our privacy model two years ago, have often overshadowed much of the good work we've done.”

He continued, “Even before the agreement announced by the FTC today, Facebook had already proactively addressed many of the concerns the FTC raised.”

Zuckerberg announced the creation of two new corporate offices, naming Erin Egan, who was previously co-chairwoman of the global privacy and data security practice of Covington & Burling, as chief privacy officer for policy. Michael Richter will become chief privacy officer for products. He's currently Facebook's chief privacy counsel on the legal team.

In the FTC case, Facebook was represented by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partners S. Ashlie Beringer and M. Sean Royall and general counsel Theodore Ullyot.


Jenna Greene writes for The National Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy. She can be contacted at [email protected].

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.