Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In February 2010, after a severe snowstorm, a manager at a manufacturing plant asked a female administrative assistant if she had made it into work the day before. When she reported that she did not make it in, the manager laughed and said he knew the female employees would not make it into work that day. Offended by the manager's comment, the administrative assistant reported it to her supervisor and an HR assistant, neither of whom took action. The next day, the administrative assistant used her cell phone to post a message on Facebook, which contained some profanity, and stated that she did not appreciate being told that she was less of a person because she was a woman. One of her coworkers participated in the Facebook conversation that ensued over the next several hours. During the conversation, the administrative assistant made several derogatory comments about the manager without specifically naming him. Report of Acting Gen. Counsel Concerning Social Media Cases, OM 12-31 (Jan. 24, 2012).
Shortly thereafter, another employee told the administrative assistant that he had just been fired. The administrative assistant told the company president that she believed the termination was unfair, and she began to cry in front of him. She then went to a restroom and posted a message on Facebook using her cell phone that indicated that she was very upset and she could not believe that employees were losing their jobs because they asked management for help. When she returned to her work area, the company president asked to meet with her and told her that she was getting upset over something that was none of her business and management did not like that she shared her opinion with other employees. Later that day, during her lunch break, the administrative assistant posted a series of comments on Facebook from her cell phone that stated that it was a very bad day, one of her friends was fired for requesting help, and she had been scolded for caring about the situation. That same day, the company president terminated her employment because of her Facebook posts and because, although she was coached on not getting involved with the problems of other employees, she had continued to voice her opinion on Facebook.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.