Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Read the Privacy Policy on the typical company's website, and it is likely to say something like this: “We recognize the importance of protecting the privacy of personally identifiable information [and] we safeguard out customers' personally identifiable information by using industry standard practices. We restrict access to non public personal information about you only to those employees who need to know that information to provide products and services to you. We use commercially reasonable physical, managerial, and technical safeguards to preserve the integrity and security of your personal information [and] make commercially reasonable efforts to ensure the security of our systems.”
If your company's Privacy Policy contains similar statements, beware: These statements paraphrase the privacy policies of defendants Wyndham Hotels, Franklin Toyota/Scion, and RockYou.com, respectively, as quoted in recent Federal Trade Commission (FTC) complaints, in which the FTC alleged that such statements, if not backed up by adequate data security measures, constitute an “unfair or deceptive act or practice,” in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. ' 45(a). See Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Wyndham Worldwide Corporation; Wyndham Hotel Group, LLC; Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, LLC; and Wyndham Hotel Management, Inc. (U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona) Case No. 2:12-cv-01365-SPL, http://ftc.gov/os/caselist/1023142/120626wyndamhotelscmpt.pdf; In the Matter of Franklin's Budget Car Sales, Inc., also doing business as Franklin Toyota/Scion FTC File No. 102 3094, www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/1023094/120607franklinautomallcmpt.pdf; United States of America (For the Federal Trade Commission) v. RockYou, Inc. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division) Case No. 3:12-cv-01487-SI, www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/1023120/120327rockyoucmpt.pdf.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.