Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At High Court's Request, Fed Circuit Reconsiders Patent Decision
Last July, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed a favorable ruling to drug manufacturers in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, a case concerning the patentability of isolated genes. That case was brought by The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Public Patent Foundation against several defendants, including Myriad Genetics Inc., which lost its method patents but won its fight to protect patents on two genes chemically separated from DNA associated with ovarian and breast cancer. On July 20 of this year, however, the parties were back in court, arguing before the Federal Circuit over whether the March 2012 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories Inc. dictates a different outcome. In Mayo, the Court invalidated patents on a method for determining the optimum drug dosage for individuals with certain diseases. The Supreme Court reasoned that the disputed method involved “laws of nature,” but not in an inventive manner, so no patent could be awarded on it. After issuing its Mayo decision, the Court invalidated the Federal Circuit's 2011 ruling and returned the case to it for reconsideration in light of Mayo. On re-argument, Jones Day partner Gregory Castanias asserted that the Federal Circuit had already concluded in its previous decision that the patents it upheld in Myriad involved “non-naturally-occurring, human-made inventions.” Thus, the Mayo decision should not alter the outcome, he said. The ACLU countered that Mayo applies to Myriad because it dealt with the issue of whether a disputed patent prevents scientists from conducting research involving a law or product of nature. If it does, and the patent is upheld, it could squelch scientific research and hinder the invention of useful products.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.