Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Supreme Court Affirms Second Circuit on Covenant Not to Sue
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Already, LLC dba YUMS v. Nike, Inc., No. 11-982 that due to Nike giving Already an unconditional covenant not to sue, Already could not challenge the validity of Nike's trademark registration in federal court. The question presented was “whether a covenant not to enforce a trademark against a competitor's existing products and any future 'colorable imitations' moots the competitor's action to have the trademark declared invalid.” Slip Op. at 1. The case arose when Nike filed a trademark infringement action, alleging that Already infringed and diluted its Air Force 1 trademark. Id. Already filed a counterclaim alleging that the trademark was invalid. Id. Eight months later, Nike issued a covenant not to sue, promising that Nike would not raise any trademark or unfair competition claim based on any of Already's existing footwear designs. Id. at 2. Due to this covenant, and over Already's objection, the district court dismissed its counterclaim. Id. The lower court held that because Already had not presented any evidence that it was developing shoes not covered by the covenant, there was no longer a substantial controversy to warrant the issuance of a declaratory judgment. Id. at 2-3. The Second Circuit affirmed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.