Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In January, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down its decision in Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. United States, No. 2012-5040 (Fed. Cir. 2013), rev'g 90 Fed. Cl. 228 (2009). See LJN's Equipment Leasing Newsletter Sept. 2008, Oct. 2008 and Jan. 2010. The decision reverses the only lower court case that had decided a LILO or SILO transaction in favor of the taxpayer, and likely ends the decade-long litigation of these contentious leveraged lease cases. While the reversal was not unexpected in light of recent appellate cases disallowing LILO/SILO tax benefits, the decision has had the, perhaps, unintended effect of calling into question the use of lessee fixed-price purchase options in sale-leasebacks and other more conventional equipment leasing transactions.
In a typical LILO, the taxpayer, acting through a grantor trust, leases assets from a tax-exempt entity (e.g., a domestic municipal transit agency or a foreign entity not subject to U.S. income taxation) under a primary or ”head” lease. A SILO transaction is similar, except that the head lease term is deliberately structured to extend beyond the remaining useful life of the asset, so that it is treated as a sale for tax purposes. At closing, the taxpayer will make a significant payment to the lessee, either the purchase price for the property (in a SILO) or a partial prepayment of its head lease. The taxpayer then leases the property back to the tax-exempt entity under a net lease, where the lessee retains substantially all rights and responsibilities to use and maintain the property during the lease term.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.