Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Does the Interstate Land Sale Full Disclosure Act (ILSA), which permits a buyer to rescind a purchase if the buyer has not received a statutorily mandated “printed property report,” apply to single-floor condominium units? In Berlin v. Renaissance Rental Partners, 2013 WL 1859140 (May 6, 2013), a divided Second Circuit concluded that a single-floor condominium unit qualifies as a “lot” within the meaning of the statute, enabling purchasers who had bought a luxury condominium unit before the 2008 real estate crash to escape from their now-unfavorable sale contracts.
The Statutory and Regulatory Framework
As the United States Supreme Court has observed, ILSA was enacted, in 1968, to “prevent false and deceptive practices in the sale of unimproved tracts of land by requiring developers to disclose information needed by potential buyers.” Flint Ridge Dev. Co. v. Scenic Rivers Ass'n, 426 U.S. 776, 778 (1976). The statute makes it unlawful for a developer to use instrumentalities of commerce to sell or lease “any lot” unless the developer has provided the purchaser with a printed property report in advance of the signing of the contract by the purchaser or lessee. 15 U.S.C. section 1703(a)(1)(B). The statute provides that if the seller does not provide the purchaser with the required property report before signing the contract, the purchaser has a right to rescind the contract within two years of its signing. 15 U.S.C. section 1703(c).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.