Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Corporate CounselorKickerFeaturesTopicsRegulationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

The Expanding Role of the Audit Committee

By William L. Floyd
January 31, 2014

The role the independent audit committee of a board of directors, not unlike the compensation committee, the nominating and governance committee, and perhaps a risk management committee, is becoming increasingly important as significant responsibilities shift to the board of directors. Regulatory authorities such as the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the Securities and Exhange Commission (SEC) are focusing on and expanding the role and the responsibility of these committees. As part of this evolution, the audit committee, which was the first committee whose independence was mandated, continues to be the one whose role is evolving most rapidly and on which additional requirements are likely to be imposed.

In addition to regulation and oversight by the SEC, public company financial statements, and thus the audit committee, are affected by rulemaking of the PCAOB. The increased focus of investors on governance of audit firms, their independence and their objectivity, is likely to increase the role of the audit committee. In addition, the PCAOB's recent proposals and rulemaking with regard to auditor independence and objectivity suggest increasing responsibility for the audit committee. Along with this increasing responsibility, increasing exposure will result, and the need for independent counsel for the audit committee will intensify.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.