Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Town Law section 277(4) and Village Law section 7-730(4) law allow local governments to require that an applicant for a residential subdivision set aside land for park and recreation purposes or pay a fee in lieu thereof to be used for park and recreation purposes, as a condition of approval. Town Law section 274-a(6) and Village Law section 7-725-a(6) authorize local governments to impose similar conditions for site plan approval. The statutes, however, specifically require that before the requirement for land or fees can be imposed, the municipality first must find that: 1) the new development creates the need for additional recreational facilities; and 2) the existing recreational facilities in the municipality are not sufficient to accommodate the additional demand.
Municipalities frequently impose these fees without making the required findings, which have led a number of courts over the years to invalidate their decisions. Moreover, because the fees are a form of an “exaction,” a local government's failure to make the required findings very well may violate the “takings” rule announced by the U.S. Supreme Court in Nollan v. California Coastal Comm'n, 483 U.S. 825 (1987) and Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), as amplified by its recent ruling in Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, 133 S.Ct. 2586 (2013).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.