Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Town Law section 277(4) and Village Law section 7-730(4) law allow local governments to require that an applicant for a residential subdivision set aside land for park and recreation purposes or pay a fee in lieu thereof to be used for park and recreation purposes, as a condition of approval. Town Law section 274-a(6) and Village Law section 7-725-a(6) authorize local governments to impose similar conditions for site plan approval. The statutes, however, specifically require that before the requirement for land or fees can be imposed, the municipality first must find that: 1) the new development creates the need for additional recreational facilities; and 2) the existing recreational facilities in the municipality are not sufficient to accommodate the additional demand.
Municipalities frequently impose these fees without making the required findings, which have led a number of courts over the years to invalidate their decisions. Moreover, because the fees are a form of an “exaction,” a local government's failure to make the required findings very well may violate the “takings” rule announced by the U.S. Supreme Court in Nollan v. California Coastal Comm'n, 483 U.S. 825 (1987) and Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), as amplified by its recent ruling in Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, 133 S.Ct. 2586 (2013).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.