Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawLitigationRegulationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

First Amendment and Trade Secrets Issues In Government/Private Promoters' Live Events

By Stan Soocher
January 31, 2016

Many local governments operate live event venues. Unlike dealing with private venues, concert promoters and producers might bring First Amendment free speech claims against government-controlled event facilities over how a local government chooses which promoters/producers with which to work. There's also the issue of whether the governmental authority or a private promoter owns ticket subscriber information that the private promoter generates through its live events work at a government-controlled venue.

Celebrity Attractions Inc. v. Oklahoma City Public Property Authority, CIV-15-1267 (W.D.Okla.), is a case in point. Though it had no written exclusivity provision, Celebrity Attractions presented the Broadway theatrical season at the government-controlled Oklahoma City Civic Center Music Hall (CCMH) for 24 years. There is a formal process for obtaining a use permit (that states the CCMH use dates, venue rental fees), as well as a written box office agreement between the Public Property Authority and a permittee covering ticket sales and related concerns. The box office agreement provides the CCMH with the sole right to sell event tickets, but stipulated Celebrity as “Primary Box Office” ticket seller for season renewals. The Public Property Authority/Celebrity agreement also stated: “All account information collected for storage and use on [the box office] ticketing system, is considered the intellectual property of T.H.E. Box Office and the Oklahoma City Public Property Authority.”

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.