Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The recent Court of Appeals decision, Sierra Club v. Vill. of Painted Post, 26 N.Y.3d 301 (2015), places a new perspective on when there is standing to challenge a land-use determination. There has been a long history of judicial analysis of what gives rise to standing to challenge a land-use approval. The interplay between the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and the vast majority of land use approvals has given rise to a number of cases applying and modifying the standing test in the context of SEQRA. Courts have distinguished between the impacts on the public in general and individuals more directly impacted by a proposed development.
“To establish standing under SEQRA, the Petitioners must show (1) that they will suffer an environmental 'injury that is in some way different from that of the public at large,' and (2) that the alleged injury falls within the zone of interest sought to be protected or promoted by SEQRA.” Barrett v. Dutchess Cty. Legislature, 38 A.D.3d 651, (2d Dep't 2007), quoting Soc'y of Plastics Indus. v. Cty. of Suffolk, 77 N.Y.2d 761 (1991).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.