Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Online Editorial Calendars Can Get You Published This Spring
At the beginning of every year, in addition to making a series of New Year's resolutions that I know I will not keep, I post updated editorial calendars for over 40 publications to my website. I do this to provide visitors with a resource that is not readily available in other places. I find that by simply reviewing them, I develop article ideas in diverse markets and during different seasons. The process actually helps me create my own content schedule and reminds me to include members of my network for profiles, interviews, or brainstorming sessions.
Most of all, engaging in this exercise helps to me to consistently build momentum. One year, I made the mistake of not reviewing my calendars early enough and missed the opportunity to propose articles to many of the publications in which I would like to see my work featured. After all, more than developing a strong idea, crafting a strong pitch, identifying an appropriate home for your content, it is critical to time your approach so that it is most relevant when received.
The secret is often following the deadlines set forth in an editorial calendar, which briefly highlight the coverage a magazine, newspaper, or website, among others, will give to a particular subject over the course of an entire year. From Credit Union Magazine to Software Development Times, there is a broad range of calendars to suit the interest of any legal professional.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.