Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Condo Board Was Intended Beneficiary of Agreement
Board of Managers of 100 Congress Condominium v. SDS Congress LLC
NYLJ 7/7/17, p. 28, col. 2
AppDiv, Second Dept.
(memorandum opinion)
In an action by a condominium board against a contractor and an engineering firm for breach of contract and professional malpractice, the engineering firm appealed from Supreme Court's denial of its motion to dismiss. The Appellate Division modified to dismiss the malpractice claim, but otherwise affirmed, holding that the condominium board's complaint sufficiently alleged that the condominium was either an intended beneficiary of the contract with the engineering firm or a successor-in-interest to the sponsor's construction contracts.
The contractor, an alleged agent of the sponsor, retained the engineering firm to inspect the building throughout construction. The condominium board brought this action against both the contractor and the engineering firm alleging that the building had been negligently constructed and inspected. The board contended that the engineering firm had breached its contract, and that the firm had committed professional malpractice. Supreme Court denied the engineering firm's motion to dismiss, and the firm appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.