Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Section 181 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) was first introduced in 2004 and, with some gaps in time, lasted through its expiration at the end of 2016. It has provided benefits to both producers of movies and television programs (and, for a shorter period of time, to producers of live stage productions) and — under pass-through legal structures such as limited liability companies — to their investors. Now, with the enactment at the end of 2017 of the sweeping new federal tax law, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Jobs Act), §181 has been given new life, with a couple of additional benefits and a couple of additional twists.
First: When can the deduction for production costs be taken? Under §181, prior to the Jobs Act, production costs incurred during a year could be deducted for such year if the costs were incurred with a reasonable certainty that the production would be completed (as a practical matter, the year in which funds for the budgeted costs had been fully raised and were beginning to be spent on production costs). That meant that unlike income forecast depreciation (the alternative in effect prior to §181's enactment), costs could be deducted even before a film was released, a television show broadcast or a live stage production had it first paid public performance.
Of course, if a project was not yet in release in the year in which production costs were incurred, there would not yet be revenue to report to take advantage of the deduction for cost of production. In that case, the production costs would produce a loss that could be carried forward and used to offset income when revenue started to come in or, alternatively, investors in a pass-through entity such as an LLC that owned the copyright to the project could take immediate advantage of the loss as a deduction against other qualifying passive income (subject to applicable limitations). And if the deduction for costs of production were not fully used against other qualifying passive income, then it could be used to offset project income when the revenue comes in.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.