Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

'Professional Development:' Embracing and Improving Your Leadership Style

By Anne Collier
April 01, 2018

To achieve your highest potential, to be more “actualized,” you must embrace your leadership style (see Table 1 below). What is your style? Are you an Achiever, Affirmer, or Asserter? What are your leadership shadow behaviors? Which of the Nine Attributes of Actualized Leaders do you need to focus on to improve your leadership, to be an Actualized Leader?

An Actualized Leader is someone who more effectively elicits the willing collaboration of others because he or she effectively manages his or her own behavior under stress. Unchecked behavior under stress is a person's “leadership shadow.” The more effectively a leader manages this shadow, the less reactive and more resilient, and therefore, more self-actualized the leader is.

The Actualized Leadership framework and concept of self-actualization is based on the seminal work of Viktor Frankl, David McClelland, Carl Jung and Abraham Maslow, from which two key concepts are derived:

  1. Our freedom to choose our response, attitude, and approach to anyone or any situation; and
  2. The concept of paradoxical intent, which posits that the more one fears something, the more likely one is to experience it.

The latter concept is critical to understanding the connection between a leader's unmitigated shadows to the leader's experience of what he or she fears under stress. Each leadership style's fear stems from the style's motive driver, as set forth in Table 1. The Achiever, for example, is motivated by achievement and fears failure. When stressed, the Achiever leads by doing it him- or herself, micromanaging and being critical and narrow minded, all but guaranteeing the team's failure.

Table 1 briefly describes the three leadership styles along with corresponding motive drivers, underlying fears, strengths, shadows and behaviors when self-actualized. Each leader has a dominant style and may have a secondary style.

Leadership Under Stress: The Shadow

Under stress, the strengths of each style can become exaggerated, bringing about the leader's underlying fear. If you're like most people, you've identified your leadership style and, like most, are chagrined by your shadow. Don't be. Everyone has shadows; the key to living to your greatest potential — to self-actualization — is to manage your shadow so that you are more resilient and less reactive.

Improving Your Leadership Style: The Nine Attributes of Actualized Leaders

The answer to the self-actualization question and the ability to mitigate shadow behaviors is found in the Nine Attributes of Actualized Leaders (Table 2). Happily, it's not a foregone conclusion that under stress a leader's shadow drives his or her behavior.

The Nine Attributes fall into two intertwined patterns: Level and Sequence (Table 2). The Levels are Cognition, Emotion and Behavior. The three levels are organized in this manner because a person's thinking affects his or her emotions, which affects behavior. Typically, a leader can improve behavior by changing thoughts and feelings, the former being the root of the latter.

The three sequences are Confidence, Performance and Renewal. If a leader wants to improve a Behavior, he or she will first want to consider the degree to which he or she experiences the attribute at both the Cognition and Emotion levels within that sequence.

For how to improve your self-actualization and resiliency, while reducing your reactivity, consider the strategies identified in Table 3.

 

Summary

Embrace your leadership style, including your shadow, and you can improve your leadership. It's as simple as engaging in one or more of strategies to improve one or more of the Nine Attributes.

*****

Anne Collier, MPP, JD, PCC, CEO of Arudia, is dedicated to improving culture and collaboration by developing clients into better leaders, managers and communicators. For more information, reach out to Anne at [email protected], 202-744-2015.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders Image

Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?