Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The broad and somewhat vague definition of religious exercise in The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) has invited much litigation over what constitutes a substantial burden and even what constitutes religious exercise.
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000cc et seq. (RLUIPA), has been a controversial statute, particularly among small municipalities. The federal statute prohibits implementation of a land use regulation “in a manner that imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person, including a religious … institution,” unless the government demonstrates that imposition of the burden is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest 42 U.S.C. 2000cc (a)(1). The broad and somewhat vague definition of religious exercise in the statute has invited much litigation over what constitutes a substantial burden and even what constitutes religious exercise. The statute’s definition “includes any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief.” 42 U.S.C 2000cc-5(7)(A).
*May exclude premium content
By Matthew Schneid
Local Law Number 97 was enacted by the City of New York to achieve reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. This is accomplished by requiring buildings to retrofit their systems with more energy efficient systems or purchase certain permitted carbon offsets.
By NYRE Staff
Neighbor Lacked Standing to Challenge Nonconforming Use Determination
Parking Congestion Allegations Insufficient to Confer Standing
Council’s Approval of PUD Upheld
Neighbor Had No Standing to Challenge SEQRA Determination
By NYRE Staff
Issues of Fact Preclude Summary Judgment on Habitability Claim
By NYRE Staff
Amendment of Bylaws Relieves Condominiums of Obligation to Use Association for Repair Services