Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

'Marketing Tech:' How Law Firms May Ensure Social Media Compliance

By Marguerita Cheng
July 01, 2018

How can law firms ensure social media compliance? What are the rules and restrictions to creating profiles, publishing content and communicating with prospects and clients? This article answers these questions and provides tips to help firms create a sound social media policy.

Law Firms and Attorneys in Social Media

Paid Facebook ads, YouTube video promotion, Twitter tweets — social media is one of the most important and effective channels in digital marketing today. Social media is a powerful platform to promote business, but it is important to establish certain policies and procedures, first.

Legal Restrictions

There are restrictions and compliance rules that attorneys and law firms must follow. Among these are:

  • Attorneys are prohibited from posting false or misleading information on a website or social media, which includes inaccurate or outdated credentials. Therefore, it's important to review all content created by any third party, such as marketing, communications or public relations firm, before publishing.
  • Bar association guidelines and federal regulations also restrict how a firm may advertise and promote legal services. Ethical rules also apply to all professional online activities, including social media.
  • Ethical regulations forbid lawyers to associate themselves with certain individuals on Facebook and other SM platforms, such as an adverse party or the judge on active cases.

What's Allowed?

On social media, lawyers are allowed to publish information about their professional and personal lives. The latter often helps reflect human insight, which may have a positive effect on prospective clients. After all, individuals like to do business with others whom they know, like and trust.

Tips for Creating a Social Media Policy

When the firm decides to embark upon its social media journey, all campaigns must be ethically compliant from the start. The best way to achieve this is by creating a social media policy. The goal is to create a dynamic policy that encourages the use of this relatively new technology while avoiding institutionalizing a static policy with too many inflexible rules. See the ABA's guidance, “How to Create a Law Firm Social Media Policy.”

Profiles

Consider implementing a pre-approval process for newly-created social media profiles. If the firm grants access to profiles for non-lawyer staff members, make it mandatory to assign an admin ID to each profile. In establishing a social media policy, also define rules for the use of your firm's logo for profile images and whether to include the firm name, address, phone number and website address.

Publishing Content

The firm should establish specific guidelines for the type of content it allows. Influencing factors are professionalism, ethics and client and company representations. The prevailing question should be: What are the consequences of publishing this particular piece of information?

Social media is about relevance, flexibility and timeliness. The marketing department should propose a process by which to monitor and pre-approve content to avoid becoming stuck in endless rounds of approvals.

Improve Over Time

The firm's social media policy should be designed to evolve as regulatory requirements continue to change. It's important to stay current with the latest developments to ensure compliance at all times.

Conclusion

Social media has created unprecedented marketing opportunities for law firms and lawyers. By establishing a thoughtful social media policy and improving it over time, CMOs can ensure that their firms comply with the rules and restrictions for social media and realize its benefits, simultaneously.

*****

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.