Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Props, L.P., 13 N.Y.3d 270, the Court of Appeals established that a landlord receiving J-51 benefits could not avail itself of the benefits of luxury deregulation. When a tenant brings an overcharge complaint based on improper luxury deregulation, how should the overcharge be computed? That issue has spawned conflicting decision in the First Department, and seems destined to reach the Court of Appeals.
By Eamon P. Joyce and Cassandra Liu
This article focuses on a recent decision upholding a pipeline developer’s exercise of eminent domain under New York law in National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. Schueckler.
Condemnee Entitled to Consequential Damages To Contiguous Parcel
Valuation for Prospective Use Rejected
Statute of Frauds Bars Lease Claim
Buildings Constitute Horizontal Multiple Dwelling
No Agreement to Renew
No Wrongful Eviction When Subtenant Remains On Premises
Alleged Title Defect Did Not Excuse Failure to Close
Statute of Limitations Bars Foreclosure Claim
Statute of Limitations Did Not Extinguish Mortgage