Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

New York's 2019 Rent Laws: Impact on Commercial Landlords

By Daniel J. Ansell
September 01, 2019

On June 14, 2019, Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed legislation modifying existing rent laws and enacting significant landlord-tenant reforms including the Statewide Housing Security and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (collectively, the 2019 Rent Laws). To date, the real estate industry has focused primarily on the sweeping impact the new laws will have on residential tenancies and the deregulation of rent-stabilized apartments. The reforms, however, also dramatically impact commercial tenancies by altering non-residential summary proceedings and significantly hampering the ability of commercial landlords to respond effectively and quickly to tenant defaults.

New York Summary Proceedings: Background

Summary proceedings were intended to provide landlords with a simple and expeditious method of regaining possession of leased space without the need for a lengthy ejectment action. There are two primary types of summary proceedings-non-payments and holdovers. Prior to commencing a non-payment proceeding, a landlord must serve a statutory rent demand setting forth a good-faith estimate of the rent due. To commence a holdover proceeding, a landlord must first terminate the lease by serving a notice of termination based on a breach by a tenant of a lease provision known as a conditional limitation. Both proceedings can ultimately result in a tenant's eviction and entry of a monetary judgment for unpaid arrears.

Effect of 2019 Rent Laws

Delay

The 2019 Rent Laws significantly delay resolution of both non-payment and holdover proceedings. For example, under prior law, a three-day rent demand was required before commencing a non-payment case. The amended laws now mandate a 14-day notice. RPAPL §711(2). In addition, the deadline for a tenant to answer a non-payment petition has been extended from five to 10 days. RPAPL §732(3).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.