Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Most companies doing business in California are well aware of the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA) and prepared diligently in advance of the law's Jan. 1, 2020 compliance deadline. While compliance certainly is key, even compliant businesses must consider — and prepare for — the eventual onslaught of class action litigation that is coming.
Indeed, at least one data breach class action lawsuit has been filed already that expressly claims a "deprivation of rights" under the CCPA based on the alleged "fail[ure] to maintain reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the nature of" personal information maintained by the defendants. Barnes v. Hanna Andersson, LLC, et al., N.D. Cal. Case No. 3:20-cv-00812. While the plaintiff in Barnes does not presently seek damages under the CCPA, she expressly "reserve[s] the right to amend this Complaint as of right" to do so at a later time. The plaintiff's decision not to seek damages under the CCPA likely stems from the retroactivity hurdles she would face, given the data breach "occurred from September 16, 2019 to November 11, 2019," and the relevant provisions of the CCPA are not expressly retroactive. Weinberg v. Valeant Pharm. Int'l, 2017 WL 6543822, at 7 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2017) ("California statutes apply prospectively unless the Legislature expressly indicates otherwise."). Nonetheless, the allegations highlight the looming threat on the horizon.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.