Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Shareholder Class Actions During, and After, COVID-19
As the global economy surges up and down, companies continue to work to represent accurately to their investors the current state of affairs. Given the turmoil in the markets, an increasing number of plaintiffs are bringing shareholder class action suits, citing corporate statements about COVID-19. Often, these lawsuits point to statements from the company's most recent SEC filings or associated press releases, and argue that the company knew that those statements were false or materially misleading based on actions that the company took not long after its reporting date. As first-quarter earnings season draws to a close, now is a good time to reflect on the shareholder class actions that have been brought to date related to COVID-19, and others potentially yet to come.
This article begins by discussing the most recent putative class action lawsuits related to COVID-19, and concludes by evaluating implications for future lawsuits.
Colony Capital, Inc.
On May 26, the plaintiffs filed a securities-fraud class action lawsuit against Colony Capital, Inc., a global investment firm with a focus on digital real estate, and several of its officers, in the Central District of California. The lawsuit alleges, in part, that Colony made statements in its recent public filings (4Q2019 10-Q, 2019 10-K), and associated earnings calls and press releases that painted a rosy picture of the company's health care and hospitality segments and their respective liquidity positions. For example, the complaint cites the 4Q2019 press release and the 2019 10-K, which both purportedly stated that "with respect to the health care and hospitality units, the Company successfully addressed all material near-term debt maturities allowing the respective business unit leaders to focus on improving cash flows through operational management and capital expenditures."
The complaint continues that the "truth" came to light in the following months, when the company disclosed that its health care and hospitality portfolio companies had defaulted on more than $3 billion in debt as a "result of the economic fallout from COVID-19." The complaint alleges that the company's public statements regarding its health care and hospitality segment were overly optimistic and materially misleading as they failed to disclose that the portfolio companies in those segments "carried unsustainable levels of debt secured by hotels and health care-related properties and were thus at a significant risk of default" due to the prospective impact of COVID-19. The company disclosed the default in its May 8 press release, after which Colony's stock price fell $0.08 per share, or 3.81%, to close at $2.02 per share on May 8.
Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.
On May 26, the plaintiffs filed a securities-fraud class action lawsuit against Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. and several of its officers in the Southern District of California. Sorrento had been developing COVID-19 antibody products that could potentially be used to "block and neutralize" the virus in at-risk populations and recently infected individuals. The complaint focuses on May 15, when the company issued a press release allegedly stating that the antibody "demonstrated 100% inhibition" of virus infections, and when the CEO gave an interview where he characterized the breakthrough as a "cure." After these statements the company's share price increased more than 280%.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?