Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Corporate ESG Integration Not Optional

By Alexandra Poe and Bryan Sillaman
April 01, 2021

Corporate ESG (environmental, social and governance) integration is becoming less optional every day, driven by increasing regulation, investor demand and the recent embrace of stakeholder capitalism. Headline announcements — such as GM's 2035 target for manufacturing only electric vehicles and the U.S. government's goal to replace its entire fleet with electric cars and trucks — do not tell the whole story.

The new EU Taxonomy Regulation, 2020 O.J. (L 198) 13, mandates what financial market participants and operating companies must address if they wish to make claims of taxonomy compliance, with a scheme largely focused on disclosure, standardized subtopics within ESG, and alignment of practices with claims. Meanwhile, the global movement toward a uniform reporting framework remains uncertain despite the December 2020 merger of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), and recent powerful endorsements of standards published by the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). In particular, the UK has announced its plans to adopt its own taxonomy and disclosure regulations, albeit also based on recommendations of the TCFD and the EU Taxonomy Regulation. In the United States, the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) announced on March 4, 2021 the creation of a Climate and ESG Task Force within the Division of Enforcement, which will "develop initiatives to proactively identify ESG-related misconduct [and] … coordinate the effective use of Division resources, including through the use of sophisticated data analysis to mine and assess information across registrants, to identify potential violations."

In addition, the SEC continues to prioritize prosecuting unsupported ESG claims, while also promising to update its 2010 guidance to provide a more coherent framework for ESG disclosures — and is asking for public comment (until May 15).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?