Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
IP News
Federal Circuit: The Doctrine of Equivalents Is Not a Binary Choice
On March 9, 2021, a Federal Circuit panel of Judges Newman, Moore, and Hughes issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Judge Moore, in Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC v. Munchkin, Inc., Case No. 2020-1203. The panel vacated the Central District of California's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement on one patent, reversed the judgment of noninfringement of a second patent, and remanded for further proceedings. Slip Op. at 13.
Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC and International Refills Company, Ltd. (Edgewell) sued Munchkin, Inc. (Munchkin) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,899,420 (the '420 Patent) and 6,974,029 (the '029 Patent). Both the '420 and '029 patents are directed to improved cassette designs for Edgewell's Diaper Genie product, "which is a diaper pail system that has … (i) a pail for collection of soiled diapers; and (ii) a replaceable cassette that is placed inside the pail and forms a wrapper around the soiled diapers." Id. at 2. The accused products, "Munchkin's Second and Third Generation refill cassettes" were "marketed as being compatible with Edgewell's Diaper Genie" products. Id.
This premium content is locked for The Intellectual Property Strategist subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.