Follow Us Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Intellectual Property Patent Litigation

Admissibility of Evidence from Post-Grant Proceedings In District Court Trials

Courts are increasingly excluding all evidence relating to post-grant proceedings before the PTAB, except when it is used for impeachment. This article reviews recent decisions on this issue from some of the nation’s busiest patent districts.


Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

District courts generally have broad discretion in determining what materials may be presented during trial, with evidentiary rulings reviewed for abuse of discretion. Consistent with this principle, the Federal Circuit has repeatedly confirmed that district courts’ discretion extends to the admissibility of evidence relating to post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). See, e.g., K-Tec, Inc. v. Vita-Mix Corp., 696 F.3d 1364, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (affirming district court’s decision to allow parties to discuss the extent to which Patent Office had considered a reference as within “the province of the district court”); Callaway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co., 576 F.3d 1331, 1342–43 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (affirming district court’s exclusion of evidence of non-final reexamination determinations based on risk of jury confusion).

To continue reading,
become a free ALM digital reader

Benefits include:

*May exclude premium content

Read These Next