[Editor's Note: As this issue was going to press, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in U.S. v. Arthrex. A summary of the decision follows, with a more detailed analysis of the ruling and its implications for practitioners to follow in the August issue.]
U.S. Supreme Court Largely Upholds IPR Proceedings In 'Arthrex'
In a decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court ruled that the statutory scheme appointing PTAB administrative patent judges (APJs) to adjudicate IPRs violates the appointments clause of the U.S. Constitution.
By
Robert E. Browne, Jr. and Ryan C. Deck
This premium content is locked for The Intellectual Property Strategist subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN The Intellectual Property Strategist
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
