Federal Class Action Available for Delay In Recording Mortgage Satisfaction

In Maddox v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., N.A., 997 F.3d 436, the Second Circuit recently held that individuals have Article III standing to seek statutory damages for a bank’s violation of Real Property Law (RPL) §275 and New Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (RPAPL) §1921 (together, “New York’s Mortgage-Satisfaction-Recording Statutes”). The Second Circuit held that, despite no “actual injury,” violations of New York statutory law constitute a concrete and particularized harm giving rise to Article III standing. This is important because under New York rules, a plaintiff could not bring a class action in state court under New York’s Mortgage-Satisfaction-Recording Statutes. Because the Second Circuit held that a bare violation of New York’s Mortgage-Satisfaction-Recording Statutes without a demonstration of actual injury conferred federal jurisdiction, a mortgagor now has the ability to bring a class action in federal court. Thus, statutes designed to be merely remedial in nature can now be used punitively against lenders and servicers.