Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Patent marking is an important step in the patent lifecycle. Setting aside inventions covered by method claims, patent marking is generally required to seek damages from infringers prior to the date the suit is filed; however, complex patenting portfolios make marking all patented products an intense act of bookkeeping. While virtual marking has somewhat reduced the overhead of marking, it suffers from the same problems all Internet-based evidence runs into in court: websites are ephemeral and have intermittent accessibility, as well as poor public logging of when information existed where, and for how long. Nonfungible tokens (NFTs) on a digital blockchain could potentially overcome these hurdles, while still providing the benefits of virtual marking via websites.
Congress initially required (in 1842) that patentees and assignees of patents mark their patented articles, imposing a fine for failing to do so. Presently, patent holders who fail to mark may be precluded from seeking compensatory damages prior to the date that an infringer was put on actual notice of alleged infringement. While the original $100 fine from 1842 would be unlikely to catch the eye of modern executives, board members, and shareholders, the loss of past damages due to a missing mark most certainly would.
Physically marking every manufactured product with accurate, up-to-date patent numbers may be a daunting task. Designing and developing new product molds for newly issued patents, correcting old or inapplicable patent numbers, and even disposing of product stock that cannot have markings corrected: all of these actions can increase production and inventory costs. Congress saw fit via the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011 to update the marking rule (codified in 35 U.S.C. Section 287) by allowing for fixing on the patent article "the word 'patent' or the abbreviation 'pat,' together with an address of a posting on the internet, accessible to the public without charge for accessing the address, that associates the patented article with the number of the patent." Web marking seeks to facilitate patent marking, while still keeping the public appraised of the federally protected rights of the patent holder.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.