Follow Us
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When the city, as a seller of real estate, attaches a document to the deed at closing, but the deed does not refer to that document, may the buyer introduce evidence to establish that the document was intended to clarify the deed description? The First Department faced that issue in Liberty Square v. The Doe Fund, Inc., 202 A.D.3d 55, and precluded the purchaser from using the document to clarify the deed description.
*May exclude premium content
By NYRE Staff
Landlord’s Re-Entry Not Authorized By Lease Provision
Plans to Demolish Building Supported Denial of Renewal Lease
Guarantor Entitled to Raise Questions of Fact About Entitlement to Rent Abatements
By Stewart E. Sterk
In Rabbi Israel Meyer Hacochen Rabbinical Seminary of America v. Town of Putnam Valley, a federal district court in the Southern District of New York dismissed a RLUIPA claim as unripe, borrowing ripeness doctrine from the takings context and declining to apply a “futility exception” to the requirement that a landowner obtain a final decision before proceeding to federal court.
By NYRE Staff
Taking Claim Ripe In Light of Town’s Failure to Act
By NYRE Staff
Multiple Dwelling Law §302 Does Not Apply to Co-Ops
Copyright © ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
