Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A bankruptcy court gave "unnecessary and likely incorrect" reasoning to support its "excessively broad proposition that sales free and clear under [Bankruptcy Code ("Code")] Section 363 override, and essentially render nugatory, the critical lessee protections against a debtor-lessor under [Code] 365(h)," said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Feb. 16, 2022. In re Royal Bistro, LLC, 2022 WL 499938, *1-*2 (5th Cir. Feb. 16, 2022). The court still denied the lessees' "motion for a writ of mandamus" for a "stay pending appeal" from a bankruptcy court order authorizing the trustee's sale of "the debtor's real property … free and clear" of the lessees' interests. Id. at *1. In essence, though, the Fifth Circuit signaled that it would not approve in later cases a bankruptcy court asset sale of real property that summarily cuts off the rights of the debtor's lessees.
The Court of Appeals stressed that the lower courts "made the mistake of relying on" the Seventh Circuit's heavily criticized decision in Precision Indus Inc. v. Qualitech Steel S.B. Q., 327 F.3d 537, 547 (7th Cir. 2003) (Section 365(h) lessee protections against a debtor-lessor do not supersede the free and clear sale terms of Section 363(f)). On the facts of the limited motion before it, the Fifth Circuit rejected the lower courts' "overstatement of their reasoning," based on their "serious misinterpretation of law or facts." 2022 WL 499938, at *2. Because the "essential state law rights of the tenants in this case [were] limited by the senior mortgagee's prior lien on the" property being sold, however, "neither [Code] Section 363(e) nor 365(h)(A)(ii) offers [the lessee-appellants] protection." Id. "[S]tate law [was] all that the bankruptcy court needed to decide this case" against the lessees. Id.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.