Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Questions of Fact About Liability for Broker Commission After Expiration of Brokerage Agreement
In an action to recover a brokerage commission, broker appealed the New York Supreme Court's denial of its summary judgment motion. Douglas Elliman of LI, LLC v. Roselle Building Co, Inc., NYLJ 2/14/22, p. 25, col. 2 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion). The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that questions of fact remained about seller's liability for a commission after expiration of the brokerage agreement.
The seller entered into a brokerage agreement providing for a 5% commission if seller entered into a contract of sale or sold the property within 60 days after termination of the agreement if the buyer had been shown the property during the term of the agreement. The agreement expired in August 2016, but the parties extended it until January 2017. The parties dispute whether they subsequently entered into an oral agreement for an open listing. In December 2017, the seller contracted to sell the property to the long-time tenant, with whom a prior sale attempt had fallen through. The contract identified the broker by name, and provided that seller would pay any commission earned pursuant to a separate agreement between broker and seller. When seller failed to pay a commission, the broker brought this action and moved for summary judgment. The New York Supreme Court denied the motion and broker appealed.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.