Follow Us
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In July 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida denied a motion to dismiss in Morford v. Cattelan, 21-20039, a decision that began by posing the question: “Can a banana taped to a wall be art?” At issue in the case was a claim by artist Joe Morford that his sculptural diptych, “Banana & Orange,” allegedly created in 2000, was infringed by a work titled “Comedian” by internationally famous artist Maurizio Cattelan. Both works prominently feature a banana affixed to a wall with silver duct tape, though Morford’s banana is plastic and Cattelan’s is overripe:
Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.
By Stan Soocher
Can the settlement of a lawsuit by one profit participant in a TV production be used to increase the contingent compensation provisions of other profit participants in the show?
In-House Counsel Perspective on Negotiating Social Media Influencer Contracts
By Chris O’Malley
With the FTC amping up its scrutiny in the social media influencer space, in-house counsel has an opportunity to mitigate risk and help their companies get more bang for their influencer marketing buck.
Pursuing AI Programmers and Third Parties over Alleged Rights Violations Caused by AI Software
By Jonathan Bick
Because AIs are capable of causing harm but cannot be a legal entity, they are not held accountable by court action. Several current and future possibilities exist to resolve AI difficulties. Current options involve identifying indirect liability. Future options include but are not limited to changing the law to make an AI a legal person and/or changing the law to make AI programing an ultra-hazardous activity.
By Entertainment Law & Finance Staff
Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.
Copyright © ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
