Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Transitional Housing Arrangements Are Not Illusory Tenancies

The Appellate Division Second Department recently issued a landmark ruling in Sapp et al v. Clark Wilson et al concerning two hot button issues; namely illusory subtenancies and status of transitional occupants.

6 minute read September 01, 2022 at 12:11 AM
By
Nativ Winiarsky
Transitional Housing Arrangements Are Not Illusory Tenancies

The Appellate Division Second Department recently issued a landmark ruling in Sapp et al v. Clark Wilson et al, __ AD3d __, 2022 NY Slip Op 04184 (2nd Dept. 2022) (Sapp) concerning two hot button issues; namely illusory subtenancies and status of transitional occupants.

This premium content is locked for New York Real Estate Law Reporter subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN New York Real Estate Law Reporter

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), which works under the umbrella of the Librarian of Congress, sets statutory-license royalty terms and rates. The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently issued two notable decisions about the CRB.

October 01, 2026