Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
During the recent oral arguments before it in Andy Warhol Foundation Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. Goldsmith, 21-869, the U.S. Supreme Court sounded open to extending more fair use protection to an Andy Warhol painting of rock icon Prince than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit did. The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. Goldsmith, 992 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2021). The Supreme Court justices peppered each side with questions in The Andy Warhol Foundation case. The court’s ruling could affect everyone from visual artists and photographers, to documentary filmmakers and Internet mashup creators.
Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.
By Stan Soocher
To the public, a band typically is defined as its performing members, not a business entity that may control the music group. But when it comes to royalty rights, are the performers or the business entity entitled to “featured artist” statutory royalties from digital transmissions of the band’s sound recordings?
Major Labels File Lawsuits Over AI Companies’ Alleged Copying of ‘World’s Most Popular’ Recordings
By Jane Wester
Major record labels including Capitol Records and Sony Music Entertainment sued two music-focused generative artificial intelligence companies, accusing them of “willful copyright infringement on an almost unimaginable scale.”
Hope for ‘Spotify Model’ for Licensing Content for AI
By Mason Lawlor
A “Spotify model” of licensing, regulation and royalties could be the answer to the recent slew of lawsuits and future litigation relating to generative artificial intelligence defined by rampant misappropriation of name, image and likeness of individuals, including high-profile celebrities.
By Entertainment Law & Finance Staff
Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.