Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes BulletinFeaturesRegulationWhite Collar Crime

The Criminal Division's Enforcement Policy: What's New for Companies Deciding Whether to Voluntarily Disclose?

By Jacqueline C. Wolff
March 01, 2023

In 1979, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new policy under which companies that voluntarily disclosed violations of the then newly enacted Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (FCPA) would be treated more leniently than those that did not come forward. Since then, the DOJ has attempted to encourage companies to voluntarily disclose all manner of criminal misconduct beyond violations of just the FCPA, while general counsels worldwide have been wrestling with the question of whether and when it is in the company's best interest to so disclose.

Is it better to conduct an investigation, remediate the problem, discipline the wrongdoer, beef up the company's compliance program and stay silent, keeping the company out of the DOJ's crosshairs and the spotlight of the media? Or is it better to take the high road of the good corporate citizen and self-report, knowing that it could result in a sharp drop in the stock price, the filing of shareholder suits, bad publicity and — if the disclosure was not to the DOJ's satisfaction — criminal charges? Even publicly traded companies that have regulatory disclosure obligations find themselves having to wrestle with these issues when the misconduct does not necessarily rise to the level of a material event. Prior guidances by the DOJ — usually announced by the Deputy Attorney General (DAG) — provided some assistance, but not enough.

This premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.