Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This article is Part Two of a two-part article. Part One appeared in our March 2023 issue (see, https://bit.ly/3ZcchD7).
In the United States and in most foreign countries, the "performance right" is one of the most important rights of copyright and, in many cases, the most lucrative. In the United States, there is no statutory license under the Copyright Act for this right. Songwriters, composers, lyricists (jointly "writers") and music publishers join these organizations, which in turn negotiate licenses with the users of music, collect the license fees from those users and distribute the monies to writers and publishers based on surveys of performances, specific payment schedules and distribution rules, as well as other factors. All performance monies are distributed 50% to writers and 50% to music publishers.
The four primary Performing Rights Organizations (PROs) in the United States are the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) founded in 1914, Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI) founded in 1939, SESAC founded in 1930 and Global Music Rights (GMR) founded in 2013. As to revenue, the four U.S. PROs collected around 3.6 billion dollars in 2022 with ASCAP and BMI being responsible for approximately 3.1 billion dollars of that total license fees are arrived at through voluntary negotiations between each PRO and an individual user or an industry-wide negotiating committee (e.g., the Radio Music License Committee, the Television Music License Committee, etc.). If an agreement cannot be reached in the case of ASCAP and BMI and any user, federal "Rate Courts" (Southern District of New York) — pursuant to consent decrees with the government dating back to 1941 — determine "reasonable" license fees, terms and what is actually licensable. In the case of SESAC, license fees are arrived at through voluntary negotiations, but due to antitrust settlements involving local radio and local television, mandatory arbitration takes effect for those two media if voluntary agreements cannot be reached. As to Global Music Rights, all license fee negotiations are voluntary as there is no consent decree, Rate Courts, mandatory arbitration or other dispute resolution procedure other than copyright infringement litigation in effect.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.