Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Tahari v. 860 Fifth Avenue Corp., 2023 WL 2483687, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an action by co-op shareholder against the co-op corporations and members of its board for actions related to a construction project, the co-op corporation appealed from Supreme Court's denial of its motion to dismiss several causes of action. The Appellate Division modified to dismiss claims for violation of Business Corporation Law (BCL) section 501(c) and for breach of fiduciary duty by the co-op corporation, but held that the claims for declaratory and injunctive relief could stand.
Unit owner unsuccessfully sought approval for a penthouse combination project. Owner then brought this action against the co-op corporation and individual board members, alleging disparate treatment in violation of BCL section 501(c) and breach of fiduciary duty against both the co-op corporation and individual board members. Defendants appealed from Supreme Court's denial of their motion to dismiss.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.